UNDERSTANDING AND ESSENCE OF LEGAL PROCESSES AS DYNAMIC SYSTEMS
نویسندگان
چکیده
The authors consider the legal process (set of procedures) as dynamic and non-linear, controlled, in addition to procedural norms, by special rules for managing processes. An attempt is made identify practical significance updating approaches understanding a category law, methodological tools theory law. Through reception individual knowledge, analysis synthesis theoretical material on problems applying synergetic approach natural human sciences, new tool has been developed purpose studying processes
منابع مشابه
Modeling Legal Contracts as Processes
This paper concentrates on the representation of the legal relations that obtain between parties once they have entered a contractual agreement and their evolution as the agreement progresses through time. Contracts are regarded as process and they are analysed in terms of the obligations that are active at various points during their life span. An informal notation is introduced that summarize...
متن کاملdiagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for writing skill
این پایان نامه بدنبال بررسی کاربرد ارزیابی مستمر در یک محیط یادگیری زبان دوم از طریق طرح چهار سوال تحقیق زیر بود: (1) درک توانایی های فراگیران زمانیکه که از طریق برآورد عملکرد مستقل آنها امکان پذیر نباشد اما در طول جلسات ارزیابی مستمر مشخص شوند; (2) امکان تقویت توانایی های فراگیران از طریق ارزیابی مستمر; (3) سودمندی ارزیابی مستمر در هدایت آموزش فردی به سمتی که به منطقه ی تقریبی رشد افراد حساس ا...
15 صفحه اولThe essence of static and dynamic bindings
Static binding is the standard binding discipline in programming languages. However, the demands of developing distributed, highly dynamic applications have led to an increasing interest in dynamic programming languages and mechanisms. Typically, this needs are satisfied by hoc mechanisms that lack clean semantics. In this paper, we adopt a foundational approach, developing a core dynamic rebin...
متن کاملUnderstanding Social Judgment: Multiple Systems And Processes
The venerable dual and multiprocess models that have guided work on attitudes and social cognition for the past few decades (see Chaiken & Trope, 1999) have been challenged recently on one hand by those who claim that there is really only one fundamental process of judgment (e.g., Fishbein & Middlestadt, 1995; Kruglanski, Erb, Pierro, Mannetti, & Chun, this issue; Kruglanski & Thompson, 1999) a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Vestnik Ûžno-Ural?skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1990-8504', '2410-4744']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/law230216